top of page


Unilateral appointment of sole arbitrator void ab initio, award rendered a nullity: Delhi high court
Delhi High Court declares unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator as void from the beginning, nullifying the award. Case Details Case Title: Airports Authority of India v. Ahluwalia Contracts India Ltd. Coram: Justice Avneesh Jhingan The Delhi High Court has set aside an arbitral award on the ground that the appointment of the sole arbitrator was unilateral and in violation of the amended Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac


When courts step in before the award: Bombay high court explains the scope of section 9 in Norvic Shipping Asia PTE ltd. v. Zigma International
Bombay High Court Clarifies Legal Intervention: Understanding Section 9 in Norvic Shipping Asia PTE Ltd. v. Zigma International. The Bombay High Court in Norvic Shipping Asia PTE Ltd. v. Zigma International, Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 15734 of 2026, decided on 2 July 2026, has delivered an important judgment explaining the scope of interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The decision discusses the circumstances in which a


Substitution of Arbitrator Is Not Automatic on Expiry of Mandate under Section 29A: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Judicial Powers
Supreme Court Clarifies: Arbitrator Substitution Not Automatic Post-Mandate Expiry under Section 29A, Outlining Judicial Powers. Introduction Time-bound arbitration was introduced in India with the objective of curbing delays and improving the efficiency of arbitral proceedings. Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, inserted by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, mandates the completion of arbitral proceedings within a prescribed perio
bottom of page
_edited.png)