top of page
_edited.png)
Supreme court holds non-signatory partners to be prima facie veritable parties to arbitration over partnership asset, leaves limitation and estoppel to arbitral tribunal
Supreme Court Decision: Non-signatory partners acknowledged as bona fide participants in arbitration related to partnership assets, with issues of limitation and estoppel deferred to the arbitral tribunal. Case Title: Hemant D. Shah HUF and Anr. v. Chittaranjan D. Shah HUF and Ors. Coram: Justice J. B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 661 SC | Civil Appeal No. 13686 of 2026 (SLP (C) No. 26474 of 2026) | Decided on 12.10.2026 The Supreme Cour
Supreme court holds Goa to be juridical seat where arbitration clause names Delhi and Goa and governing law clause vests exclusive jurisdiction in Goa courts
Supreme Court Designates Goa as Juridical Seat with Exclusive Jurisdiction, Despite Arbitration Clause Naming Delhi and Goa. Case Title: Arcis Clean Energy Pvt. Ltd. v. Parshva Innovation[1] Coram: Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Vijay Bishnoi Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 660 SC | Civil Appeal No. 13663/2026 (SLP (C) No. 35915 of 2025) | Decided on 12.10.2026 The Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Delhi High Court appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Ar
Madras high court declines to proceed with section 11 arbitration petition pending NCLAT appeal
Madras High Court pauses Section 11 arbitration proceedings as NCLAT appeal is pending. Jagson Colorchem Ltd. v. Jayapushpam Investments and Trading Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Madras | 1 September 2026 The Madras High Court recently considered whether a petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 could proceed while an appeal relating to insolvency proceedings was pending before the National Company Law
bottom of page