top of page


Section 29A extension maintainable even after mandate termination, parties not to blame for arbitrator's failure to pronounce award: Himachal Pradesh high court
Courtroom Insight: Himachal Pradesh High Court Clarifies Section 29A Extension Rules Regarding Arbitrator Delays. Ramesh Chand v. National Highways Authority of India and Anr. | Himachal Pradesh High Court | Decided on May 19, 2026 The Himachal Pradesh High Court has allowed applications filed under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for extension of time to conclude arbitration proceedings, holding that an application for such extension is maintaina


Rescuing the Expired Mandate: Supreme Court on Section 29A Extensions
Supreme Court Reviews Section 29A Extensions: Addressing Expired Mandates with Judicial Insight. Background Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 prescribes a twelve-month period from the completion of pleadings for an arbitral tribunal to deliver its award in domestic arbitrations. Parties may by consent extend this by a further six months under Section 29A(3). Beyond eighteen months, only a court can grant further time, upon sufficient cause shown. The q
bottom of page
_edited.png)