top of page
_edited.png)
Madras high court declines to proceed with section 11 arbitration petition pending NCLAT appeal
Madras High Court pauses Section 11 arbitration proceedings as NCLAT appeal is pending. Jagson Colorchem Ltd. v. Jayapushpam Investments and Trading Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Madras | 1 September 2026 The Madras High Court recently considered whether a petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 could proceed while an appeal relating to insolvency proceedings was pending before the National Company Law
Arbitrator has no power to appoint advocate commissioner for collecting evidence, power under section 17 subject to bar in sections 26 and 27: Kerala high court
Kerala High Court Rules Arbitrators Cannot Appoint Advocate Commissioners for Evidence Collection; Legal Powers Limited Under Section 17, as Barred by Sections 26 and 27. Case Title: DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. v. Aditya Deo and Anr. Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4484 HC Coram: Justice Easwaran S. The Kerala High Court has held that an Arbitral Tribunal does not have the power to appoint an advocate commissioner to collect evidence, and that the power to grant interim measures
bottom of page