top of page
_edited.png)
Supreme court: Arbitral tribunal alone can decide whether termination dispute falls within ‘excepted matters’, writ court cannot circumscribe its section 16 jurisdiction
Supreme Court clarifies that only an arbitral tribunal can resolve if a termination dispute falls under 'excepted matters,' maintaining its authority under section 16 and limiting writ court's jurisdiction. Case Name: GVV Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. Coram: Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 631 SC | Civil Appeal No. 12525 of 2026 | Decided on 08.09.2026 The Supreme Court has held that a writ appellate court cannot, while
Delhi high court reaffirms limited scope of section 34 review while upholding arbitral award in DLF Home Developers v. Klassik Lamitex
Delhi High Court affirms limited scope of Section 34 review, upholding arbitral award in DLF Home Developers v. Klassik Lamitex case. In DLF Home Developers Ltd. v. Klassik Lamitex Pvt. Ltd., O.M.P. (COMM) 379/2021, decided on 5 August 2026, the Delhi Hig Court considered the limited scope of judicial interference with an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court, presided over by Justice Subramonium Prasad, dismissed DLF Home D
bottom of page