top of page
_edited.png)
Interpretation of limitation of liability clause in contract is within arbitrator's domain, section 34 court cannot substitute its own view: Bombay high court
"Legal Authority Confirmed: Bombay High Court affirms that interpreting limitation of liability clauses in contracts remains within the arbitrator's jurisdiction, emphasizing non-interference by courts under section 34." Case Name: Conso Feeds v. Alfa Laval (India) Pvt. Ltd. Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4335 HC Coram: Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh The Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that t
When a contract does not provide for demurrage, can TAMP rates create the liability?
"Exploring Contractual Liabilities: Can TAMP Rates Impose Demurrage Without Explicit Contract Terms? | adrEdge ODR Platform" Vizag Seaport Pvt. Ltd. v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Case: APO 112 of 2022 with IA No. GA/1/2022 Court: High Court of Calcutta Date of Decision: 25 June 2026 Coram: Arijit Banerjee J. and Om Narayan Rai J. Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 3412 HC Statutes: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 The Calcutta High Court's dec
bottom of page