top of page
_edited.png)
Arbitral tribunal can draw sustenance from CPC provisions in interest of justice, even though commercial courts act amendments not mandatorily applicable to arbitration: Calcutta high court
"Calcutta High Court Rules: Arbitral Tribunals May Reference CPC for Justice Interests, Without Mandatory Application of Commercial Courts Act Amendments." Case Title: Kolkata Municipal Corporation v. Bengal Shelter Housing Development Ltd. Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4553 HC Coram: Justice Shampa Dutt The Calcutta High Court has set aside a procedural order passed by a Sole Arbitrator, holding that the chief examination of all witnesses of a party ought to be recorded before
Calcutta high court: Amendment of written statement in commercial suit continues to be governed by order VI rule 17 CPC, permissible at any stage before commencement of trial
Calcutta High Court Rules on Amendment of Written Statements in Commercial Suits: Permitted Anytime Before Trial Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Case Title: Dredging and Desiltation Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Mackintosh Burn and Northern Express Consortium and Ors. The Calcutta High Court has held that amendment of a written statement in a commercial suit continues to be governed by the unamended provisions of Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and may be allowed at
bottom of page