Calcutta High Court Upholds Arbitral Award, Confirms Appellant's Breach in Supply Contract Dispute. Case Title: Neo Metaliks Ltd. v. Orrisa Metaliks Pvt. Ltd. Coram: Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi The Calcutta High Court has dismissed an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment of the Single Judge refusing to interfere with an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Act. The Division Bench of Justic

Calcutta High Court Rules on Amendment of Written Statements in Commercial Suits: Permitted Anytime Before Trial Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Case Title: Dredging and Desiltation Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Mackintosh Burn and Northern Express Consortium and Ors. The Calcutta High Court has held that amendment of a written statement in a commercial suit continues to be governed by the unamended provisions of Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and may be allowed at

Calcutta High Court emphasizes that mediation cannot be mandated in mutual consent divorce cases, asserting the importance of voluntary participation. Citation: Danish Karim v. Ranjana Chowdhury, F.A.T. 22 of 2026, IA No. CAN 1 of 2026, decided on 20 July 2026, Calcutta High Court. In a significant ruling delivered on 20 July 2026 in Danish Karim v. Ranjana Chowdhury (F.A.T. 22 of 2026), the Calcutta High Court reaffirmed an important principle governing matrimonial disputes