Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between the seat and venue of arbitration, highlighting key legal implications. The Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 23 September 2026, Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. and Ors. v. GSCO (Gurmeet Singh and Company) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., examined an important question concerning the territorial jurisdiction of courts in arbitration proceedings. The case primarily concerned whether the place where arbitral proceedings were conducted could

Supreme Court Rules on Article 227: Revising Arbitral Tribunal Orders Requires Clear Lack of Jurisdiction, Featuring adrEdge's Legal Insight Platform. Case Title: Manash Kamal Bezboruah v. Bokahola Tea Company Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. The Supreme Court has held that a High Court, while exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution against an Arbitral Tribunal's order rejecting an application under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996