top of page
_edited.png)
When proof matters: Delhi high court on damages and confidentiality in conciliation
Delhi High Court Deliberates on the Importance of Evidence in Conciliation Cases Involving Damages and Confidentiality. Eco Green Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Vikartan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The Delhi High Court, in Eco Green Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Vikartan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., examined important issues concerning the award of damages in arbitration and the confidentiality of conciliation proceedings. The judgment highlights that while an arbitral tribunal may use its exper
Delhi high court dismisses section 34 challenge, holds limitation not raised before tribunal cannot be agitated for the first time, rejects plea of incapacity
Delhi High Court dismisses Section 34 challenge, affirming that new limitations not raised before the tribunal cannot be introduced, rejecting the plea of incapacity. Case Title: Prime Meiden Ltd. v. Kirby Building System India Pvt. Ltd. Case No.: O.M.P. (COMM) 113/2021 Coram: Justice Jasmeet Singh Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 5217 HC Date of Decision: 08 September 2026 The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Delhi high court sets aside rejection of counter-claim on performance bank guarantee, holds proceeds cannot be retained without proving loss
Delhi High Court overturns rejection of a counter-claim on performance bank guarantee, ruling that proceeds cannot be retained without proven loss. Case Title: Isgec Heavy Engineering Ltd. v. Prakash Industries Ltd. Case No.: O.M.P. (COMM) 503/2023 Coram: Justice Avneesh Jhingan Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 5219 HC Date of Decision: 08 September 2026 The Delhi High Court has set aside the part of an arbitral award that allowed a purchaser to retain the proceeds of an encashed
Section 34 court can correct computational errors in arbitral award without merits review, applying Gayatri Balasamy: Bombay high court
Bombay High Court Rules: Section 34 Courts Can Correct Computational Errors in Arbitral Awards Without Merits Review, Following Gayatri Balasamy. Case Title: Themis Medicare Ltd. v. Mohinder Pal Singh Anand and Anr. Case Number: Arbitration Petition No. 322 of 2018 with Interim Application No. 3410 of 2026 Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4895 HC Coram: Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh The Bombay High Court has partly allowed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat
Arbitrator has no power to appoint advocate commissioner for collecting evidence, power under section 17 subject to bar in sections 26 and 27: Kerala high court
Kerala High Court Rules Arbitrators Cannot Appoint Advocate Commissioners for Evidence Collection; Legal Powers Limited Under Section 17, as Barred by Sections 26 and 27. Case Title: DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. v. Aditya Deo and Anr. Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 4484 HC Coram: Justice Easwaran S. The Kerala High Court has held that an Arbitral Tribunal does not have the power to appoint an advocate commissioner to collect evidence, and that the power to grant interim measures
Supreme court refers MSME dispute to arbitration through Delhi international arbitration centre, leaves question of independent recourse under A&C act open
Supreme Court directs MSME dispute to Delhi International Arbitration Centre, leaving the question of independent recourse under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act unresolved. Patel Infrastructure Ltd. v. Aditya Construction | Civil Appeal No. 10057 of 2026 | Supreme Court of India | Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva | Decided on August 5, 2026 Background The Supreme Court was called upon to consider whether a buyer of goods or services from a micro or small
Delhi high court upholds Rs. 662 crore arbitral award in favour of Toyo engineering-L&T consortium, dismisses IOCL's section 34 challenge
Delhi High Court affirms Rs. 662 crore arbitral award favoring Toyo Engineering-L&T consortium, dismissing IOCL's Section 34 challenge in a landmark decision. Case Title: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Toyo Engineering Corporation and Anr. Coram: Justice Amit Bansal The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition filed by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated 11th March, 2019, whereby a con
bottom of page