top of page


Delhi high court: 2nd application under section 9 of arbitration & conciliation act seeking reliefs already declined in earlier petition between same parties not maintainable
Delhi High Court rules that a second application under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, seeking reliefs previously declined in an earlier petition involving the same parties, is not maintainable. Case Name: DC Multi Modal Park Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharashtra MMLP Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Coram: Justice Tushar Rao Gedela Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 5009 HC | O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 145/2026 | Decided on 01.09.2026 The Delhi High Court has held that a second petition under Section


Supreme court: Arbitral tribunal alone can decide whether termination dispute falls within ‘excepted matters’, writ court cannot circumscribe its section 16 jurisdiction
Supreme Court clarifies that only an arbitral tribunal can resolve if a termination dispute falls under 'excepted matters,' maintaining its authority under section 16 and limiting writ court's jurisdiction. Case Name: GVV Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. Coram: Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 631 SC | Civil Appeal No. 12525 of 2026 | Decided on 08.09.2026 The Supreme Court has held that a writ appellate court cannot, while
bottom of page
_edited.png)